S Rithin S/o Suresha vs T Ningappa S/o Thippeswamy — 14/2024

Case under Sec 138 and 142 N.i.act. Status: Evidence -Criminal. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Evidence -Criminal Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADG620000082024

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

04-Jan-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

04-Jan-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR

Judge

256-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec 138 and 142 N.i.act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S Rithin S/o Suresha

    Adv. K M SUNIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T Ningappa S/o Thippeswamy

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments- Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 14/2024 On 24.02.2026, the court recorded the testimony of Petitioner (PW-1) S Rithin. The witness testified regarding unauthorized financial dealings and multiple cheque-related cases filed against him. Key issues included signature discrepancies between notices and documents, alleged misuse of blank cheques, and claims regarding unauthorized financial transactions. The court observed that a notice sent to the Respondent on 27.09.2023 had signature variations compared to the cheque document (NPI-1). The case was adjourned for further proceedings; the Respondent's counsel requested time and was granted adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  11. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  12. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  13. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  15. 23-Aug-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  17. 12-Jul-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  18. 08-Jul-2025

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  19. 09-May-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  20. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  21. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence -Criminal

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  22. 25-Jan-2025

    NBW To Accused

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    NBW To Accused

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  24. 19-Oct-2024

    NBW To Accused

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  25. 31-Aug-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  26. 10-Jul-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  27. 08-May-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  28. 11-Mar-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Jagalur

  29. 04-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 14/2024 On 24.02.2026, the court recorded the testimony of Petitioner (PW-1) S Rithin. The witness testified regarding unauthorized financial dealings and multiple cheque-related cases filed against him. Key issues included signature discrepancies between notices and documents, alleged misuse of blank cheques, and claims regarding unauthorized financial transactions. The court observed that a notice sent to the Respondent on 27.09.2023 had signature variations compared to the cheque document (NPI-1). The case was adjourned for further proceedings; the Respondent's counsel requested time and was granted adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case