S Rithin S/o Suresha vs T Ningappa S/o Thippeswamy — 14/2024
Case under Sec 138 and 142 N.i.act. Status: EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KADG620000082024
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
3/2024
Filing Date
04-01-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
04-01-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR
Judge
256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S Rithin S/o Suresha
Adv. K M SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
T Ningappa S/o Thippeswamy
Hearing History
Judge: 256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR
EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS- CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL |
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS- CRIMINAL |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 14/2024 On 24.02.2026, the court recorded the testimony of Petitioner (PW-1) S Rithin. The witness testified regarding unauthorized financial dealings and multiple cheque-related cases filed against him. Key issues included signature discrepancies between notices and documents, alleged misuse of blank cheques, and claims regarding unauthorized financial transactions. The court observed that a notice sent to the Respondent on 27.09.2023 had signature variations compared to the cheque document (NPI-1). The case was adjourned for further proceedings; the Respondent's counsel requested time and was granted adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 14/2024 On 24.02.2026, the court recorded the testimony of Petitioner (PW-1) S Rithin. The witness testified regarding unauthorized financial dealings and multiple cheque-related cases filed against him. Key issues included signature discrepancies between notices and documents, alleged misuse of blank cheques, and claims regarding unauthorized financial transactions. The court observed that a notice sent to the Respondent on 27.09.2023 had signature variations compared to the cheque document (NPI-1). The case was adjourned for further proceedings; the Respondent's counsel requested time and was granted adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts