S Rithin S/o Suresha vs T Ningappa S/o Thippeswamy — 14/2024

Case under Sec 138 and 142 N.i.act. Status: EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADG620000082024

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

20th July 2026

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

04-01-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

04-01-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR

Judge

256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR

Acts & Sections

SEC 138 AND 142 N.I.ACT

Petitioner(s)

S Rithin S/o Suresha

Adv. K M SUNIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

T Ningappa S/o Thippeswamy

Hearing History

Judge: 256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR

15-05-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

24-04-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

24-03-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

13-03-2026

ARGUMENTS- CRIMINAL

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 14/2024 On 24.02.2026, the court recorded the testimony of Petitioner (PW-1) S Rithin. The witness testified regarding unauthorized financial dealings and multiple cheque-related cases filed against him. Key issues included signature discrepancies between notices and documents, alleged misuse of blank cheques, and claims regarding unauthorized financial transactions. The court observed that a notice sent to the Respondent on 27.09.2023 had signature variations compared to the cheque document (NPI-1). The case was adjourned for further proceedings; the Respondent's counsel requested time and was granted adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 14/2024 On 24.02.2026, the court recorded the testimony of Petitioner (PW-1) S Rithin. The witness testified regarding unauthorized financial dealings and multiple cheque-related cases filed against him. Key issues included signature discrepancies between notices and documents, alleged misuse of blank cheques, and claims regarding unauthorized financial transactions. The court observed that a notice sent to the Respondent on 27.09.2023 had signature variations compared to the cheque document (NPI-1). The case was adjourned for further proceedings; the Respondent's counsel requested time and was granted adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case