Manjula vs Basappa Advocate - ABJ — 47/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520030492021
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
367/2021
Filing Date
14-12-2021
Registration No
47/2022
Registration Date
08-02-2022
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjula
Adv. H.G. SRINATH
Respondent(s)
Basappa Advocate - ABJ
Anjaneya
Adv. ABJ
Rangappa
Adv. ABJ
Ganesha
Adv. ABJ
Durugappa dead by his LRs(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
FOR OBJECTION TO IA
FOR OBJECTION TO IA
FOR OBJECTION TO IA
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 26-03-2026 | FOR OBJECTION TO IA |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR OBJECTION TO IA |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR OBJECTION TO IA |
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 47/2022 On 02-04-2026, witness examination was conducted and oath administered. Respondent Basappa Advocate's main examination was recorded, wherein he affirmed that all matters stated in his written statement are true and the signature is his own. The petitioner's counsel cross-examined respondents 2-5, establishing family relationships and contesting certain claims about residency and signatures. The court adjourned the case to allow the opposing counsel time to prepare, with further proceedings scheduled before the Principal Civil Judge, J.M.F.C., Honnaḷḷi. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 47/2022 On 02-04-2026, witness examination was conducted and oath administered. Respondent Basappa Advocate's main examination was recorded, wherein he affirmed that all matters stated in his written statement are true and the signature is his own. The petitioner's counsel cross-examined respondents 2-5, establishing family relationships and contesting certain claims about residency and signatures. The court adjourned the case to allow the opposing counsel time to prepare, with further proceedings scheduled before the Principal Civil Judge, J.M.F.C., Honnaḷḷi. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts