The Honnali PS vs Nagaraja M H — 1588/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 504, 324, 506, 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520028662021
Filing Number
1588/2021
Filing Date
06-12-2021
Registration No
1588/2021
Registration Date
06-12-2021
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
HONNALI PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Honnali PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nagaraja M H
Harisha M H
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 09-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 1588/2021 Court Decision: The accused persons, Nagaraja M.H. and Harisha M.H., were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 (assault, causing injury, insult, and criminal intimidation) by the Honnali Court on April 15, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant (PW1) and victims (PW7, PW8)—all brothers—testified to the alleged assault, critical independent witnesses (eye witnesses PW4-PW6 and mahazar witnesses PW2-PW3) turned hostile and failed to corroborate the prosecution case. The doctor's evidence was inconclusive, noting injuries could result from accidental falls. The lack of corroboration from independent witnesses created reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal under the principle that guilt must be proven beyond all reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 1588/2021 Court Decision: The accused persons, Nagaraja M.H. and Harisha M.H., were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 (assault, causing injury, insult, and criminal intimidation) by the Honnali Court on April 15, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant (PW1) and victims (PW7, PW8)—all brothers—testified to the alleged assault, critical independent witnesses (eye witnesses PW4-PW6 and mahazar witnesses PW2-PW3) turned hostile and failed to corroborate the prosecution case. The doctor's evidence was inconclusive, noting injuries could result from accidental falls. The lack of corroboration from independent witnesses created reasonable doubt, necessitating acquittal under the principle that guilt must be proven beyond all reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts