STATE BY PSI, EXCISE PS, HONNALI SUB DVISION vs Sharath D H S/o Hanumanthappa — 1462/2024
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 14,(2),15,32(1). Status: EVIDENCE CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520022992024
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
1462/2024
Filing Date
12-12-2024
Registration No
1462/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY PSI, EXCISE PS (Police Station), HONNALI SUB DVISION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sharath D H S/o Hanumanthappa
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 1462/2024 Court: Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Honnali Parties: State (Excise PS, Honnali) v. Sharath D H S/o Hanumanthappa Outcome: The court recorded witness examination on 13-03-2026. An excise officer testified about seizing 96 packets of IMFL whisky (90 ML bottles) and 30 packets sent for chemical testing during a search operation on 26-02-2024. The seized material was marked as exhibit. The accused's counsel disputed the prosecution's case, challenging the evidence and procedure. The court continued proceedings with examination of prosecution witnesses; no final judgment announced in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 1462/2024 Court: Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Honnali Parties: State (Excise PS, Honnali) v. Sharath D H S/o Hanumanthappa Outcome: The court recorded witness examination on 13-03-2026. An excise officer testified about seizing 96 packets of IMFL whisky (90 ML bottles) and 30 packets sent for chemical testing during a search operation on 26-02-2024. The seized material was marked as exhibit. The accused's counsel disputed the prosecution's case, challenging the evidence and procedure. The court continued proceedings with examination of prosecution witnesses; no final judgment announced in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts