Sakamma vs Govindaiah — 199/2019
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520021452019
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
200/2019
Filing Date
22-10-2019
Registration No
199/2019
Registration Date
22-10-2019
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sakamma
Adv. T. Shivappa
Respondent(s)
Govindaiah
Rangamma
Susheelamma
Lakshmamma
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
ORDERS CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 09-02-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 199/2019 (Sakamma v. Govindaiah and others): The court allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No. VII) to produce additional documents under Order 7 Rule 14 of the CPC in this partition and separate possession suit. The court found the plaintiff's reasons for late production credible and held that allowing the documents would not prejudice the defendants, who would retain full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The defendant's delay argument was rejected as mere technicality. The application was granted subject to payment of Rs. 300 costs, with proceedings to continue for further cross-examination of PW1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 199/2019 (Sakamma v. Govindaiah and others): The court allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No. VII) to produce additional documents under Order 7 Rule 14 of the CPC in this partition and separate possession suit. The court found the plaintiff's reasons for late production credible and held that allowing the documents would not prejudice the defendants, who would retain full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The defendant's delay argument was rejected as mere technicality. The application was granted subject to payment of Rs. 300 costs, with proceedings to continue for further cross-examination of PW1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts