M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa vs Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane — 1296/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: EVIDENCE CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: KADG520020972024

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

1296/2024

Filing Date

04-12-2024

Registration No

1296/2024

Registration Date

04-12-2024

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa

Adv. M.GUDDAPPA

Respondent(s)

Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

24-02-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

17-12-2025

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

16-09-2025
Deposition
13-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 1296/2024 Petitioner: M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa Respondent: Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane On 13-01-2026, the court heard witness testimony regarding a land dispute involving 4 acres. The petitioner's counsel claimed ownership and use of the land for cultivation, stating he planted crops for 2 years and derived income from maize cultivation (20-25 quintals per acre, yielding ₹1,40,000-1,50,000 annually). He contended he invested ₹3-4 lakhs for initial construction and ₹8-10 lakhs for further improvements on the 4-acre property. The case was adjourned for the respondent's arguments, and the matter remains pending before the court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1296/2024 Petitioner: M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa Respondent: Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane On 13-01-2026, the court heard witness testimony regarding a land dispute involving 4 acres. The petitioner's counsel claimed ownership and use of the land for cultivation, stating he planted crops for 2 years and derived income from maize cultivation (20-25 quintals per acre, yielding ₹1,40,000-1,50,000 annually). He contended he invested ₹3-4 lakhs for initial construction and ₹8-10 lakhs for further improvements on the 4-acre property. The case was adjourned for the respondent's arguments, and the matter remains pending before the court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case