M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa vs Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane — 1296/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: EVIDENCE CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520020972024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
1296/2024
Filing Date
04-12-2024
Registration No
1296/2024
Registration Date
04-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa
Adv. M.GUDDAPPA
Respondent(s)
Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1296/2024 Petitioner: M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa Respondent: Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane On 13-01-2026, the court heard witness testimony regarding a land dispute involving 4 acres. The petitioner's counsel claimed ownership and use of the land for cultivation, stating he planted crops for 2 years and derived income from maize cultivation (20-25 quintals per acre, yielding ₹1,40,000-1,50,000 annually). He contended he invested ₹3-4 lakhs for initial construction and ₹8-10 lakhs for further improvements on the 4-acre property. The case was adjourned for the respondent's arguments, and the matter remains pending before the court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1296/2024 Petitioner: M S Lokesh S/o Late M Shekharappa Respondent: Prabhu S/o Shekharappa Doddamaner Mane On 13-01-2026, the court heard witness testimony regarding a land dispute involving 4 acres. The petitioner's counsel claimed ownership and use of the land for cultivation, stating he planted crops for 2 years and derived income from maize cultivation (20-25 quintals per acre, yielding ₹1,40,000-1,50,000 annually). He contended he invested ₹3-4 lakhs for initial construction and ₹8-10 lakhs for further improvements on the 4-acre property. The case was adjourned for the respondent's arguments, and the matter remains pending before the court for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts