NYAMATHI PS vs SIDDESHA Advocate - BU — 1206/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section USEC506504143144147148149489A323324OFIPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520020582015
Filing Number
1209/2015
Filing Date
03-11-2015
Registration No
1206/2015
Registration Date
04-11-2015
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
NYMATHI PS
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NYAMATHI PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
SIDDESHA Advocate - BU
ASHOKA
CHIDANANDA
NEELAPPA ALIYAS NAGAPPA
BASAVARAJA
SHEKHARAPPA
AMRUTH
SUBHASH AIYAS SUBYA YANE SUBYA
PRAKASHA
MANJAPPA
ANNAPPA
Hearing History
Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 02-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 23-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1206/2015 All 11 accused were acquitted of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, assault, dowry harassment, abusive language, and criminal intimidation. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the primary victim (PW-1) turned hostile, denying the allegations, while key witnesses including mahazar witnesses and the eyewitness also retracted their statements or denied witnessing the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1206/2015 All 11 accused were acquitted of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, assault, dowry harassment, abusive language, and criminal intimidation. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the primary victim (PW-1) turned hostile, denying the allegations, while key witnesses including mahazar witnesses and the eyewitness also retracted their statements or denied witnessing the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts