Ramappa S/o Huchangappa vs Nagaraja Naika S/o Bheema Naika — 324/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and2. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG520019392024

EVIDENCE CIVIL

Next Hearing

27th July 2026

Filing Number

326/2024

Filing Date

16-11-2024

Registration No

324/2024

Registration Date

16-11-2024

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 7rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Ramappa S/o Huchangappa

Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY

Manjappa S/o Huchangappa

Respondent(s)

Nagaraja Naika S/o Bheema Naika

Raja Naika S/o Nagaraja Naika

Hearing History

Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI

01-06-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

20-02-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

09-02-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

20-01-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Orders
13-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: O.S. 324/2024 The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiffs Ramappa and Manjappa against defendants Nagaraja Naika and Raja Naika. The plaintiffs, brothers who inherited agricultural land (34 and 31 guntas in survey nos. 66-67, Hanumasagara village) through their mother, sought to restrain the defendants from interfering with their possession after the defendants allegedly dug a trench on the property in November 2024. The court found a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and risk of irreparable harm, supported by registered sale deeds, mutation records, and RTC extracts in plaintiffs' names. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 324/2024 The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiffs Ramappa and Manjappa against defendants Nagaraja Naika and Raja Naika. The plaintiffs, brothers who inherited agricultural land (34 and 31 guntas in survey nos. 66-67, Hanumasagara village) through their mother, sought to restrain the defendants from interfering with their possession after the defendants allegedly dug a trench on the property in November 2024. The court found a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and risk of irreparable harm, supported by registered sale deeds, mutation records, and RTC extracts in plaintiffs' names. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case