Ramappa S/o Huchangappa vs Nagaraja Naika S/o Bheema Naika — 324/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and2. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520019392024
Next Hearing
27th July 2026
Filing Number
326/2024
Filing Date
16-11-2024
Registration No
324/2024
Registration Date
16-11-2024
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramappa S/o Huchangappa
Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY
Manjappa S/o Huchangappa
Respondent(s)
Nagaraja Naika S/o Bheema Naika
Raja Naika S/o Nagaraja Naika
Hearing History
Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
ORDERS CRIMINAL
ORDERS CRIMINAL
ORDERS CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 20-02-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 09-02-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 20-01-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 324/2024 The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiffs Ramappa and Manjappa against defendants Nagaraja Naika and Raja Naika. The plaintiffs, brothers who inherited agricultural land (34 and 31 guntas in survey nos. 66-67, Hanumasagara village) through their mother, sought to restrain the defendants from interfering with their possession after the defendants allegedly dug a trench on the property in November 2024. The court found a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and risk of irreparable harm, supported by registered sale deeds, mutation records, and RTC extracts in plaintiffs' names. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 324/2024 The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiffs Ramappa and Manjappa against defendants Nagaraja Naika and Raja Naika. The plaintiffs, brothers who inherited agricultural land (34 and 31 guntas in survey nos. 66-67, Hanumasagara village) through their mother, sought to restrain the defendants from interfering with their possession after the defendants allegedly dug a trench on the property in November 2024. The court found a prima-facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and risk of irreparable harm, supported by registered sale deeds, mutation records, and RTC extracts in plaintiffs' names. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts