VIRUPAKSHAPPA vs MALLAPPA DEAD BY LRS. SMT.GIRIJAMMA Advocate - UK — 284/2013
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section U/S26OFCPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520016082013
Filing Number
287/2013
Filing Date
29-10-2013
Registration No
284/2013
Registration Date
30-10-2013
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIRUPAKSHAPPA
Adv. RHK
Respondent(s)
MALLAPPA DEAD BY LRS. SMT.GIRIJAMMA Advocate - UK
SAKAMMA
Adv. KTP
YESHODA
LOLAKSHI
N SHEKARAPPA
Parameshwarappa C.S S/o Late Shivappa,
Gowramma W/o Late Lokeshawarappa,
Chandrashekarappa N L S/o Late Lokeshawarappa,
Veeranagowda N L S/o Late Lokeshawarappa,
Jayamma W/o Palakshappa, D/o Late Shivappa,
H M Shivanandappa S/o Mahadevappa,
H B Vasanthappa S/o Mahadevappa,
Manjulamma D/o Mahadevappa W/o Thimmappa,
Megharaj S/o Mahadevappa
Kamalakshi D/o Mahadevappa W/o Chandraiah,
Shakunthala W/o Virupakshappa D/o Mahadevappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
FOR REPLY
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 07-04-2026 | FOR REPLY |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 25-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Virupakshappa v. Mallappa (OS 284/2013) Court Decision: The suit was dismissed with costs. The court found against the plaintiff on all issues, determining he failed to establish ownership, possession, or interference by defendants regarding the disputed property. Key Reasoning: The plaintiff's title claim rested on unregistered partition deeds that lacked proper description of the property and were not binding on deceased Defendant No. 1 or his heirs (who were not parties to the documents). Revenue records showed the property stood in the defendants' names, not the plaintiff's, undermining his possession claim. The court concluded the plaintiff produced insufficient evidence of valid title or actual possession as of the suit filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Deposition
Case Summary: Virupakshappa v. Mallappa (OS 284/2013) Court Decision: The suit was dismissed with costs. The court found against the plaintiff on all issues, determining he failed to establish ownership, possession, or interference by defendants regarding the disputed property. Key Reasoning: The plaintiff's title claim rested on unregistered partition deeds that lacked proper description of the property and were not binding on deceased Defendant No. 1 or his heirs (who were not parties to the documents). Revenue records showed the property stood in the defendants' names, not the plaintiff's, undermining his possession claim. The court concluded the plaintiff produced insufficient evidence of valid title or actual possession as of the suit filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts