Chaitra K K vs Girijamma — 187/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520014962025
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
189/2025
Filing Date
28-06-2025
Registration No
187/2025
Registration Date
28-06-2025
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chaitra K K
Adv. S.N.PRAKASHA
Respondent(s)
Girijamma
Eshappa S/o Shanmukappa
Basavarajappa S/o Timmappa Patteppara
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 187/2025 On 04.03.2026, the witness appeared and was sworn in. The respondent's counsel objected, stating language barriers with Kannada and English documents. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, identifying the three respondents and their relationships to Geetha (the subject of dispute). The witness explained the suit property's boundaries and stated the petition was filed after respondents wrongfully interfered with the petitioner's possession. The case was adjourned and time granted for the respondent's counsel to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 187/2025 On 04.03.2026, the witness appeared and was sworn in. The respondent's counsel objected, stating language barriers with Kannada and English documents. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, identifying the three respondents and their relationships to Geetha (the subject of dispute). The witness explained the suit property's boundaries and stated the petition was filed after respondents wrongfully interfered with the petitioner's possession. The case was adjourned and time granted for the respondent's counsel to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts