Chaitra K K vs Girijamma — 187/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: Evidence CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Evidence CIVIL Next hearing 08-Jul-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG520014962025

Filing Number

189/2025

Filing Date

28-Jun-2025

Registration No

187/2025

Registration Date

28-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

255-Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chaitra K K

    Adv. S.N.PRAKASHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Girijamma

  2. 2.Eshappa S/o Shanmukappa

  3. 3.Basavarajappa S/o Timmappa Patteppara

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 187/2025 On 04.03.2026, the witness appeared and was sworn in. The respondent's counsel objected, stating language barriers with Kannada and English documents. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, identifying the three respondents and their relationships to Geetha (the subject of dispute). The witness explained the suit property's boundaries and stated the petition was filed after respondents wrongfully interfered with the petitioner's possession. The case was adjourned and time granted for the respondent's counsel to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  14. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  16. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  18. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  22. 16-Aug-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  23. 18-Jul-2025

    Issues CIVIL

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  24. 14-Jul-2025

    Orders Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  25. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  26. 08-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  27. 04-Jul-2025

    For Written Statements

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  28. 02-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  29. 30-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Jugde And JMFC Honnali

  30. 28-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 28-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 187/2025 On 04.03.2026, the witness appeared and was sworn in. The respondent's counsel objected, stating language barriers with Kannada and English documents. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, identifying the three respondents and their relationships to Geetha (the subject of dispute). The witness explained the suit property's boundaries and stated the petition was filed after respondents wrongfully interfered with the petitioner's possession. The case was adjourned and time granted for the respondent's counsel to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case