Chaitra K K vs Girijamma — 187/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG520014962025

EVIDENCE CIVIL

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

Filing Number

189/2025

Filing Date

28-06-2025

Registration No

187/2025

Registration Date

28-06-2025

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

Chaitra K K

Adv. S.N.PRAKASHA

Respondent(s)

Girijamma

Eshappa S/o Shanmukappa

Basavarajappa S/o Timmappa Patteppara

Hearing History

Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

24-03-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

04-03-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

Interim Orders

21-08-2025
Deposition
21-08-2025
Deposition
13-01-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 187/2025 On 04.03.2026, the witness appeared and was sworn in. The respondent's counsel objected, stating language barriers with Kannada and English documents. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, identifying the three respondents and their relationships to Geetha (the subject of dispute). The witness explained the suit property's boundaries and stated the petition was filed after respondents wrongfully interfered with the petitioner's possession. The case was adjourned and time granted for the respondent's counsel to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 187/2025 On 04.03.2026, the witness appeared and was sworn in. The respondent's counsel objected, stating language barriers with Kannada and English documents. The witness testified regarding a property dispute, identifying the three respondents and their relationships to Geetha (the subject of dispute). The witness explained the suit property's boundaries and stated the petition was filed after respondents wrongfully interfered with the petitioner's possession. The case was adjourned and time granted for the respondent's counsel to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case