Smt.Girijamma dead by L.Rs. Sri.K.M.Shivappa vs Sri.Veerappa — 14/2016
Case under U/ Sec 54 R /w Order 20 Rule 10 of Cpc Section 54,20,18. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 21st April 2026.
FDP - FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS
CNR: KADG520014182016
Filing Number
14/2016
Filing Date
08-09-2016
Registration No
14/2016
Registration Date
08-09-2016
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Girijamma dead by L.Rs. Sri.K.M.Shivappa
Adv. S.N.PRAKASHA
Smt.Bhagirathi Yane Bhagamma
Respondent(s)
Sri.Veerappa
Smt.Subjhadramma
Adv. SSB
Hearing History
Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
Settlement
FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT
FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT
FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Settlement |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT |
| 11-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 14/2016 Summary: The court accepted a compromise petition filed by both parties (petitioners Girijamma's legal representatives and respondents Veerappa and Subjhadramma) under CPC Order 23 Rule 3. After verifying that both parties entered into the compromise voluntarily without coercion, duress, or undue influence, and confirming the compromise terms were lawful, the court decreed the petitioners' petition in accordance with the agreed compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 14/2016 Summary: The court accepted a compromise petition filed by both parties (petitioners Girijamma's legal representatives and respondents Veerappa and Subjhadramma) under CPC Order 23 Rule 3. After verifying that both parties entered into the compromise voluntarily without coercion, duress, or undue influence, and confirming the compromise terms were lawful, the court decreed the petitioners' petition in accordance with the agreed compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts