The PSI Honnali PS vs Ningaraja K R Advocate - KV — 1045/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 337, 304(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520013432020
Filing Number
1045/2020
Filing Date
05-08-2020
Registration No
1045/2020
Registration Date
05-08-2020
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
HONNALI PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The PSI Honnali PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ningaraja K R Advocate - KV
Nagappa Daddi
Adv. KTP
Veeresh K R
Adv. KV
Halasiddappa S
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 01-04-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 26-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 1045/2020 - PSI Honnali PS v. Ningaraja K R & Others The court recorded the statement of Accused No. 1 under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, wherein the accused denied the incriminating evidence presented by the prosecution. The accused's bail application under Section 437(A) Cr.P.C. was allowed, and he was directed to execute a bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety. No defence evidence was called. The case proceeded toward arguments following the completion of the prosecution's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 1045/2020 - PSI Honnali PS v. Ningaraja K R & Others The court recorded the statement of Accused No. 1 under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, wherein the accused denied the incriminating evidence presented by the prosecution. The accused's bail application under Section 437(A) Cr.P.C. was allowed, and he was directed to execute a bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety. No defence evidence was called. The case proceeded toward arguments following the completion of the prosecution's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts