STATE BY PSI, NYAMATHI PS, NYAMATHI vs Ragavendra K S S/o Shivappa G H — 396/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520007612024
Filing Number
396/2024
Filing Date
28-05-2024
Registration No
396/2024
Registration Date
28-05-2024
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0038
Police Station
NYMATHI PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY PSI, NYAMATHI PS (Police Station), NYAMATHI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ragavendra K S S/o Shivappa G H
Elumalai S/o Lae Gopalappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 23-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 11-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 396/2024 Summary: The Additional Civil Judge acquitted accused Raghavendra K S of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal motor vehicle collision case. The court found that the prosecution entirely failed to prove its case, as all independent witnesses—including the deceased's son (complainant), eyewitnesses, and mahazar witnesses—turned hostile and denied the prosecution's allegations despite cross-examination. Without credible independent witness corroboration, the court held the prosecution evidence insufficient to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 396/2024 Summary: The Additional Civil Judge acquitted accused Raghavendra K S of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal motor vehicle collision case. The court found that the prosecution entirely failed to prove its case, as all independent witnesses—including the deceased's son (complainant), eyewitnesses, and mahazar witnesses—turned hostile and denied the prosecution's allegations despite cross-examination. Without credible independent witness corroboration, the court held the prosecution evidence insufficient to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts