STATE BY PSI, NYAMATHI PS, NYAMATHI vs Ragavendra K S S/o Shivappa G H — 396/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520007612024
Filing Number
396/2024
Filing Date
28-May-2024
Registration No
396/2024
Registration Date
28-May-2024
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0038
Police Station
NYMATHI PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BY PSI, NYAMATHI PS (Police Station), NYAMATHI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ragavendra K S S/o Shivappa G H
-
2.Elumalai S/o Lae Gopalappa
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case 396/2024 Summary: The Additional Civil Judge acquitted accused Raghavendra K S of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal motor vehicle collision case. The court found that the prosecution entirely failed to prove its case, as all independent witnesses—including the deceased's son (complainant), eyewitnesses, and mahazar witnesses—turned hostile and denied the prosecution's allegations despite cross-examination. Without credible independent witness corroboration, the court held the prosecution evidence insufficient to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgments CIVIL
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
23-Mar-2026
313 StatementView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments Criminal
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
13-Mar-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
11-Mar-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
05-Mar-2026
For Witness Warrant
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
21-Feb-2026
For Witness Warrant
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
17-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Criminal
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence Criminal
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Criminal
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
17-Dec-2025
For Witness Warrant
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Criminal
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Criminal
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
03-Oct-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
17-Sep-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
30-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
04-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
06-May-2025
Summons
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
21-Mar-2025
Summons
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
29-Jan-2025
Summons
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
21-Dec-2024
Summons
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
08-Nov-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
21-Sep-2024
Summons
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
26-Jul-2024
Summons
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Honnali
-
28-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2024
Case 396/2024 Summary: The Additional Civil Judge acquitted accused Raghavendra K S of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal motor vehicle collision case. The court found that the prosecution entirely failed to prove its case, as all independent witnesses—including the deceased's son (complainant), eyewitnesses, and mahazar witnesses—turned hostile and denied the prosecution's allegations despite cross-examination. Without credible independent witness corroboration, the court held the prosecution evidence insufficient to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts