Veerashekharappa vs Panchaksharappa — 181/2023

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec.26 of Cpc Section 26. Status: JUDGMENTS CIVIL. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG520006452023

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

182/2023

Filing Date

28-06-2023

Registration No

181/2023

Registration Date

03-07-2023

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 R/W Sec.26 of CPC Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Veerashekharappa

Adv. DORESWAMY.M.B.

Respondent(s)

Panchaksharappa

Shivanandappa

Rudreshappa

Panchaksharappa

Ganeshappa

Veerabhadrappa

Shivamurthy

Hearing History

Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

27-04-2026

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

15-04-2026

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

06-04-2026

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

27-03-2026

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

23-03-2026

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

Interim Orders

28-11-2024
Deposition
21-02-2025
Deposition
05-04-2025
Deposition
04-04-2024
Issue
17-06-2025
Deposition
02-08-2025
Deposition
06-08-2025
Deposition
13-08-2025
Deposition
04-09-2025
Deposition
20-09-2025
Deposition
10-10-2025
Deposition
13-11-2025
Deposition
04-12-2025
Deposition
15-12-2025
Deposition
03-01-2026
Deposition
05-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: O.S. No. 181/2023 Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' application (I.A. No. VII) seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to ascertain encroachment on the disputed property. The court found that defendants had failed to establish sufficient grounds for the commissioner's appointment, noting that a surveyor had already conducted a survey, submitted reports, and testified as a witness in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 181/2023 Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' application (I.A. No. VII) seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to ascertain encroachment on the disputed property. The court found that defendants had failed to establish sufficient grounds for the commissioner's appointment, noting that a surveyor had already conducted a survey, submitted reports, and testified as a witness in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case