Siddappa vs Sarojamma — 115/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520004062023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
115/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
115/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddappa
Adv. B.UMESH
Respondent(s)
Sarojamma
Venkatesh
Anjaneya
Annapoorna
Geetha
Hanumanthamma
Sunandamma
Gangamma
Leelavathi
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 24-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 23-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 115/2023 Case: Original Suit 115/2023, Siddappa v. Sarojamma, Venkatesh, and Anjaneya Outcome: The court heard witness testimony on 24.03.2026 under oath. Defendants 6, 8, and 9 (through their counsel) presented evidence regarding family property succession following the death of their father approximately 35 years prior. The court acknowledged that property Schedule Item No. 1 remains in the name of defendant Sheshagiri, Item No. 2 was being cultivated, and confirmed equal rights and interests of defendants 7-9 in the scheduled properties. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 115/2023 Case: Original Suit 115/2023, Siddappa v. Sarojamma, Venkatesh, and Anjaneya Outcome: The court heard witness testimony on 24.03.2026 under oath. Defendants 6, 8, and 9 (through their counsel) presented evidence regarding family property succession following the death of their father approximately 35 years prior. The court acknowledged that property Schedule Item No. 1 remains in the name of defendant Sheshagiri, Item No. 2 was being cultivated, and confirmed equal rights and interests of defendants 7-9 in the scheduled properties. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts