The PSI of Nyamathi PS vs Nagaraja K H — 58/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,323,341,504,34. Status: FOR WITNESS WARRANT. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KADG520002092023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
58/2023
Filing Date
20-02-2023
Registration No
58/2023
Registration Date
20-02-2023
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
NYMATHI PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The PSI of Nyamathi PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nagaraja K H
Suresha
Halesha
Hearing History
Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI
FOR WITNESS WARRANT
FOR WITNESS WARRANT
FOR WITNESS WARRANT
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | FOR WITNESS WARRANT |
| 28-03-2026 | FOR WITNESS WARRANT |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR WITNESS WARRANT |
| 04-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 58/2023 A witness (Nagaraja, age 38) testified on 04.03.2026 regarding an altercation that occurred on 14.09.2022 at noon between the three accused and Witness 1 (Chasa 1). The witness stated that accused persons threw stones onto his land, and when questioned about it, the first accused attacked Chasa 1. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel revealed inconsistencies: the witness admitted being 30-40 feet away, could not name the approximately 6-7 people present, and acknowledged an ongoing civil dispute between his uncle and the first accused. The court considered the witness's testimony partially adversarial and permitted hostile cross-examination. The case proceedings continued with examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 58/2023 A witness (Nagaraja, age 38) testified on 04.03.2026 regarding an altercation that occurred on 14.09.2022 at noon between the three accused and Witness 1 (Chasa 1). The witness stated that accused persons threw stones onto his land, and when questioned about it, the first accused attacked Chasa 1. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel revealed inconsistencies: the witness admitted being 30-40 feet away, could not name the approximately 6-7 people present, and acknowledged an ongoing civil dispute between his uncle and the first accused. The court considered the witness's testimony partially adversarial and permitted hostile cross-examination. The case proceedings continued with examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts