The PSI of Nyamathi PS vs Nagaraja K H — 58/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,323,341,504,34. Status: FOR WITNESS WARRANT. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: KADG520002092023

FOR WITNESS WARRANT

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

58/2023

Filing Date

20-02-2023

Registration No

58/2023

Registration Date

20-02-2023

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI

FIR Details

FIR Number

132

Police Station

NYMATHI PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

IPC Section 506,323,341,504,34

Petitioner(s)

The PSI of Nyamathi PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Nagaraja K H

Suresha

Halesha

Hearing History

Judge: 1087-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HONNALI

07-05-2026

FOR WITNESS WARRANT

28-03-2026

FOR WITNESS WARRANT

13-03-2026

FOR WITNESS WARRANT

04-03-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

16-10-2025
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition
04-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: CC 58/2023 A witness (Nagaraja, age 38) testified on 04.03.2026 regarding an altercation that occurred on 14.09.2022 at noon between the three accused and Witness 1 (Chasa 1). The witness stated that accused persons threw stones onto his land, and when questioned about it, the first accused attacked Chasa 1. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel revealed inconsistencies: the witness admitted being 30-40 feet away, could not name the approximately 6-7 people present, and acknowledged an ongoing civil dispute between his uncle and the first accused. The court considered the witness's testimony partially adversarial and permitted hostile cross-examination. The case proceedings continued with examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 58/2023 A witness (Nagaraja, age 38) testified on 04.03.2026 regarding an altercation that occurred on 14.09.2022 at noon between the three accused and Witness 1 (Chasa 1). The witness stated that accused persons threw stones onto his land, and when questioned about it, the first accused attacked Chasa 1. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel revealed inconsistencies: the witness admitted being 30-40 feet away, could not name the approximately 6-7 people present, and acknowledged an ongoing civil dispute between his uncle and the first accused. The court considered the witness's testimony partially adversarial and permitted hostile cross-examination. The case proceedings continued with examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case