Manjula W/o Karibasappa vs Veerappa S/o Haladappa Apranjer Mane — 27/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: FOR REPLY. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG520001192025

FOR REPLY

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

Filing Number

26/2025

Filing Date

21-01-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

21-01-2025

Court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI

Judge

255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

Manjula W/o Karibasappa

Adv. M.GUDDAPPA

Respondent(s)

Veerappa S/o Haladappa Apranjer Mane

Veerabhadrappa S/o Haladappa

Shivappa S/o Haladappa Apranjeer Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI

07-04-2026

FOR REPLY

13-03-2026

FOR REPLY

04-03-2026

FOR REPLY

19-02-2026

FOR REPLY

07-02-2026

FOR REPLY

Interim Orders

18-03-2025
Orders

Case 27/2025 Summary: The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Manjula against respondents Veerappa, Veerabhadrappa, and Shivappa, restraining them from interfering with her possession of the suit schedule property until the next hearing. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3(a) and pay process fees within 7 days, or the order stands vacated automatically. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence (e-swathu, mutation extract, tax receipts, and police acknowledgment) supporting the plaintiff's apprehension of defendant interference. Suit summons and TI notice will be issued to defendants; next hearing on 18.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 27/2025 Summary: The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Manjula against respondents Veerappa, Veerabhadrappa, and Shivappa, restraining them from interfering with her possession of the suit schedule property until the next hearing. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3(a) and pay process fees within 7 days, or the order stands vacated automatically. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence (e-swathu, mutation extract, tax receipts, and police acknowledgment) supporting the plaintiff's apprehension of defendant interference. Suit summons and TI notice will be issued to defendants; next hearing on 18.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case