Manjula W/o Karibasappa vs Veerappa S/o Haladappa Apranjer Mane — 27/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Status: FOR REPLY. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520001192025
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
21-01-2025
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjula W/o Karibasappa
Adv. M.GUDDAPPA
Respondent(s)
Veerappa S/o Haladappa Apranjer Mane
Veerabhadrappa S/o Haladappa
Shivappa S/o Haladappa Apranjeer Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
FOR REPLY
FOR REPLY
FOR REPLY
FOR REPLY
FOR REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | FOR REPLY |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR REPLY |
| 04-03-2026 | FOR REPLY |
| 19-02-2026 | FOR REPLY |
| 07-02-2026 | FOR REPLY |
Interim Orders
Case 27/2025 Summary: The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Manjula against respondents Veerappa, Veerabhadrappa, and Shivappa, restraining them from interfering with her possession of the suit schedule property until the next hearing. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3(a) and pay process fees within 7 days, or the order stands vacated automatically. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence (e-swathu, mutation extract, tax receipts, and police acknowledgment) supporting the plaintiff's apprehension of defendant interference. Suit summons and TI notice will be issued to defendants; next hearing on 18.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 27/2025 Summary: The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Manjula against respondents Veerappa, Veerabhadrappa, and Shivappa, restraining them from interfering with her possession of the suit schedule property until the next hearing. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3(a) and pay process fees within 7 days, or the order stands vacated automatically. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence (e-swathu, mutation extract, tax receipts, and police acknowledgment) supporting the plaintiff's apprehension of defendant interference. Suit summons and TI notice will be issued to defendants; next hearing on 18.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts