HEMAVATHI vs SAVITRAMMA — 29/2015
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section U/O7RULE1OFCPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520001052015
Filing Number
29/2015
Filing Date
23-01-2015
Registration No
29/2015
Registration Date
23-01-2015
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEMAVATHI
Adv. M.S.SHIVASWAMY
Respondent(s)
SAVITRAMMA
RAMAPPA
BASAMMA
RATHNAMMA
HALASWAMY
SUDHA
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Disposed
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Hemavathi v. Savitramma and Others (OS 29/2015) Court Decision: The suit for partition and separate possession was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that plaintiff Hemavathi and defendants 1, 2, 4-6 are each entitled to an 8/49th share in the joint family properties, while defendant 3 (the widow) is entitled to a 1/49th share. Key Reasoning: The court established that all parties are members of a Hindu Undivided Family created by their deceased father Channaveerappa Gowda, who had three wives. The suit schedule properties constitute joint family assets. Documentary evidence (genealogical tree, RTC extracts, mutation records) and testimony confirmed the family relationships and joint ownership, with both sides admitting the joint family status and property character. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Hemavathi v. Savitramma and Others (OS 29/2015) Court Decision: The suit for partition and separate possession was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that plaintiff Hemavathi and defendants 1, 2, 4-6 are each entitled to an 8/49th share in the joint family properties, while defendant 3 (the widow) is entitled to a 1/49th share. Key Reasoning: The court established that all parties are members of a Hindu Undivided Family created by their deceased father Channaveerappa Gowda, who had three wives. The suit schedule properties constitute joint family assets. Documentary evidence (genealogical tree, RTC extracts, mutation records) and testimony confirmed the family relationships and joint ownership, with both sides admitting the joint family status and property character. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts