Allabhakshi vs Sayed Mohiddin Advocate - SNP — 17/2019
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG520000502019
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
17/2019
Filing Date
10-01-2019
Registration No
17/2019
Registration Date
10-01-2019
Court
CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC, HONNALI
Judge
255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Allabhakshi
Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY
Sayed Rahamatulla Represnted by their GPA holder Plaintiff No.1 Allabhakshi
Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY (MA)
Masturabi Represted by their GPA Holder Plaintiff No.1 Allabhakshi
Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY (MA)
Rihana Begum Represtend by their GPA holder plaintiff No.1 Allabhakshi
Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY (MA)
Kousar Parveen Represented by their GPA holder Plaintiff No.1 Allabhakshi
Adv. H.M.SRINIVASA MURTHY (MA)
Respondent(s)
Sayed Mohiddin Advocate - SNP
Sayed Jameer
Adv. EXPARTY
Sayed Nijaam
Adv. EXPARTY
Jinath Bi
Adv. EXPARTY
BiBi Asma
Adv. EXPARTY
B.V.Halesha
Adv. KPS
Nagaraja
Adv. KPJ
Manjoji Rao
Adv. KPJ
Hearing History
Judge: 255-PRL CIVIL JUGDE AND JMFC HONNALI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
FOR WRITTEN STATEMENTS
FOR WRITTEN STATEMENTS
FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR WRITTEN STATEMENTS |
| 07-02-2026 | FOR WRITTEN STATEMENTS |
| 28-01-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT PLAINT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 17/2019 On 03-09-2025, a witness appeared and testified under oath. The plaintiff's counsel presented the main examination, confirming that the plaintiff testified and submitted their examination-in-chief as evidence, with all details therein being true and signatures authentic. The respondent's counsel requested time for cross-examination, which was granted. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 17/2019 On 03-09-2025, a witness appeared and testified under oath. The plaintiff's counsel presented the main examination, confirming that the plaintiff testified and submitted their examination-in-chief as evidence, with all details therein being true and signatures authentic. The respondent's counsel requested time for cross-examination, which was granted. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts