Smt. S M Savithramma W/o Jagadeesh vs Smt. Neelamma W/o Late Shamanuru Basappa Advocate - M.K. Satheesh — 219/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 2. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG320037682022
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
220/2022
Filing Date
06-12-2022
Registration No
219/2022
Registration Date
06-12-2022
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
252-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. S M Savithramma W/o Jagadeesh
Adv. Chandrappa T
Smt. S.M Jyothi W/o Vagish B S
Smt. S M Rekha W/o Girish H K
Smt. S M Sushmitha W/o Jayesh T
Respondent(s)
Smt. Neelamma W/o Late Shamanuru Basappa Advocate - M.K. Satheesh
Sri. Yogeshappa S B S/o Late Shamanuru Basappa
Adv. K.G. SHANTHARAJA
Sri. Basavesha S Y S/o Yogeshappa S B
Adv. Kariyappa P.H.
Hearing History
Judge: 252-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Steps
For amended plaint
ORDERS CIVIL
ORDERS CIVIL
ORDERS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Steps |
| 28-03-2026 | For amended plaint |
| 27-03-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 219/2022 Order Date: 28 March 2026 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (I.A.No.IV) to amend their plaint in this declaration and permanent injunction suit. The court found the proposed amendment—adding allegations that defendant No.2 colluded with S.B. Manjunatha to fabricate a gift deed—necessary for adjudicating the real dispute and not altering the suit's nature. The plaintiffs were permitted to proceed with the amendment, with costs imposed at Rs.500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 219/2022 Order Date: 28 March 2026 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (I.A.No.IV) to amend their plaint in this declaration and permanent injunction suit. The court found the proposed amendment—adding allegations that defendant No.2 colluded with S.B. Manjunatha to fabricate a gift deed—necessary for adjudicating the real dispute and not altering the suit's nature. The plaintiffs were permitted to proceed with the amendment, with costs imposed at Rs.500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts