STATE BY MALEBENNUR POLICE STATION vs Karibasaiah S/o Late Ujjinaiah — 1039/2023
Case under 279 Ipc Section 114,323,504,34,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KADG320022372023
e-Filing Number
23-09-2023
Filing Number
1039/2023
Filing Date
23-09-2023
Registration No
1039/2023
Registration Date
25-09-2023
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0223
Police Station
MALEBENNUR PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY MALEBENNUR POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Karibasaiah S/o Late Ujjinaiah
Smt Savitha W/o Karibasaiah
Veeraiah S/o Kalyanaiah
Hearing History
Judge: 1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1039/2023 Court Decision: All three accused—Karibasaiah (teacher), Savitha (housewife), and Veeraiah (agriculturist)—were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 504, 114, 323, and 506 R/w Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The main complainant and victim were interested witnesses with conflicting testimony; the only independent witness provided minimal corroboration; and a three-day delay in filing the complaint raised doubts. The court emphasized the underlying dispute concerned family property partition and noted the accused had also filed a counter-complaint, suggesting mutual animosity rather than proven assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1039/2023 Court Decision: All three accused—Karibasaiah (teacher), Savitha (housewife), and Veeraiah (agriculturist)—were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 504, 114, 323, and 506 R/w Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The main complainant and victim were interested witnesses with conflicting testimony; the only independent witness provided minimal corroboration; and a three-day delay in filing the complaint raised doubts. The court emphasized the underlying dispute concerned family property partition and noted the accused had also filed a counter-complaint, suggesting mutual animosity rather than proven assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts