Smt. Shashikala.V @ Sudha vs Mithun Chakravarthi . N. Kale Advocate - Sakamma N.S — 170/2019

Case under Domestic Violence Act,2005 Section 12(1). Status: ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KADG320016772019

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

170/2019

Filing Date

28-08-2019

Registration No

170/2019

Registration Date

28-08-2019

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR

Judge

253-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act,2005 Section 12(1)

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Shashikala.V @ Sudha

Adv. RPP

Respondent(s)

Mithun Chakravarthi . N. Kale Advocate - Sakamma N.S

Smt. Meerabai C/o Ningappa Kale

Adv. Sakamma N.S

Smt. Lakshmi C/o Ningapp kale

Adv. Sakamma N.S

Manjunath Doddamani C/o Lakshman Doddamani

Adv. Sakamma N.S

Hearing History

Judge: 253-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR

02-06-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

15-04-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

08-04-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

02-04-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

06-11-2024
Deposition
03-02-2025
Deposition
20-02-2025
Deposition
04-03-2025
Deposition
08-10-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: Cri.Case 170/2019 Outcome: The case was adjourned for cross-examination. On 08.10.2025, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness RW-1. The respondent's counsel presented three documentary exhibits (from related cases 448/2018, 182/2018, and 19/2024), which were marked as evidence. The petitioner's counsel requested time for cross-examination of the witness, and the case was postponed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.Case 170/2019 Outcome: The case was adjourned for cross-examination. On 08.10.2025, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness RW-1. The respondent's counsel presented three documentary exhibits (from related cases 448/2018, 182/2018, and 19/2024), which were marked as evidence. The petitioner's counsel requested time for cross-examination of the witness, and the case was postponed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case