Yashodamma vs Smt. Kusumavathi dead by his Lrs., Ravindra Kumar B Advocate - SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE — 8/2020
Case under Order 41 Rule 5 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KADG320013282020
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
8/2020
Filing Date
29-08-2020
Registration No
8/2020
Registration Date
29-08-2020
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yashodamma
Adv. R.M.K.
Respondent(s)
Smt. Kusumavathi dead by his Lrs., Ravindra Kumar B Advocate - SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
Smt. Kusumavathi dead by his LRs., Smt. Latha.
Adv. SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
Kusumavathi dead by his LRs., Rudramma
Adv. SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
Kusumavathi dead by his LRs., Mamatha
Adv. SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
Kusumavathi dead by his LRs., Smt. Savitha
Adv. SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
Smt. Kusumavathi dead by his LRs.,B. Gururaj
Adv. SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
B. Rajashekharappa
Adv. SHRIDHAR V MEHARWADE
Hearing History
Judge: 1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
EVIDENCE CIVIL
Amended plaint
ORDERS CIVIL
ORDERS CIVIL
ORDERS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 06-04-2026 | Amended plaint |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
| 19-02-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Yashodamma v. B. Bhairappa & Others (FDP 8/2020) Outcome: The court allowed Yashodamma's application under Section 151 CPC and modified her property share from 1/2 to 1/3 in ancestral property, bringing it equal to male heirs under the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005. The court directed redrawing of the preliminary decree reflecting equal shares for all three parties (petitioner and two respondent groups each receiving 1/3 share). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Yashodamma v. B. Bhairappa & Others (FDP 8/2020) Outcome: The court allowed Yashodamma's application under Section 151 CPC and modified her property share from 1/2 to 1/3 in ancestral property, bringing it equal to male heirs under the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005. The court directed redrawing of the preliminary decree reflecting equal shares for all three parties (petitioner and two respondent groups each receiving 1/3 share). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts