STATE BY MALEBENNUR POLICE STATION vs Revanasiddayya S/o Late. Mallikarjunayya — 713/2023
Case under 279 Ipc Section 506,341,34,504,447,323,354(B). Status: ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KADG320012792023
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-07-2023
Filing Number
713/2023
Filing Date
27-07-2023
Registration No
713/2023
Registration Date
27-07-2023
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
FIR Details
FIR Number
0177
Police Station
MALEBENNUR PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY MALEBENNUR POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Revanasiddayya S/o Late. Mallikarjunayya
Channappaswamy S/o Late. Mallikarjunayya
Parvathamma W/o Late. Mallikarjunayya
Hearing History
Judge: 1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 28-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 09-04-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 713/2023 The court examined witness testimony in this criminal case concerning an alleged assault. The court found that the prosecution's key witnesses (PW-04 and PW-01) provided inconsistent and unreliable testimony regarding the alleged incident that occurred between 9:00-9:30 AM. Critical evidentiary gaps included: witnesses could not identify all persons present, the FIR was filed with unexplained delays, no injuries were properly documented despite hospital visit claims, and the scene showed no physical evidence (no footmarks or disturbance) one day after the alleged occurrence. The court concluded the accused's statements claiming no assault occurred were not contradicted and that prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in acquittal of the accused (Revanasiddayya, Channappaswamy, and Parvathamma). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 713/2023 The court examined witness testimony in this criminal case concerning an alleged assault. The court found that the prosecution's key witnesses (PW-04 and PW-01) provided inconsistent and unreliable testimony regarding the alleged incident that occurred between 9:00-9:30 AM. Critical evidentiary gaps included: witnesses could not identify all persons present, the FIR was filed with unexplained delays, no injuries were properly documented despite hospital visit claims, and the scene showed no physical evidence (no footmarks or disturbance) one day after the alleged occurrence. The court concluded the accused's statements claiming no assault occurred were not contradicted and that prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in acquittal of the accused (Revanasiddayya, Channappaswamy, and Parvathamma). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts