STATE BY MALEBENNUR POLICE STATION vs Gadigeaiah S/o LATE UJJINAYYA — 670/2023

Case under 279 Ipc Section 448,504,506,323,34,503. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADG320011412023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-07-2023

Filing Number

670/2023

Filing Date

13-07-2023

Registration No

670/2023

Registration Date

17-07-2023

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR

Judge

1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0222

Police Station

MALEBENNUR PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

279 IPC Section 448,504,506,323,34,503

Petitioner(s)

STATE BY MALEBENNUR POLICE STATION

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Gadigeaiah S/o LATE UJJINAYYA

Smt Pushpa W/o Gadhigeyya

Hearing History

Judge: 1287-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR

24-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL

10-04-2026

JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL

09-04-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: C.C. No. 670/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Gadigeaiah and Smt. Pushpa of charges under IPC sections 448 (criminal trespass), 504 (insult), 323 (simple hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to weak evidence relying solely on interested witnesses without independent corroboration and no physical injury evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

30-10-2025
Deposition
21-11-2025
313 Statement
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 670/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused Gadigeaiah and Smt. Pushpa of charges under IPC sections 448 (criminal trespass), 504 (insult), 323 (simple hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to weak evidence relying solely on interested witnesses without independent corroboration and no physical injury evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case