Mohamed Yusuff vs The Birth and Death Registrar City Municipal Council Harihar — 50/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 1969-REGISTRATIONOFBIRTHSANDDEA. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KADG320001512026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
50/2026
Filing Date
14-Jan-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
14-Jan-2026
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
253-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harihar
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
HARIHAR TOWN PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohamed Yusuff
Adv. BHAGEERATHI G H
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Birth and Death Registrar City Municipal Council Harihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: Mohamed Yusuff v. Birth and Death Registrar (Case 50/2026) The court allowed Mohamed Yusuff's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the registrar to register his mother Hameera Bi's death (dated 05.09.1975 at Ladwa Oni, Harihara). The registration was not filed initially due to family inadvertence, but the court found unchallenged evidence of her death and recognized petitioner's hardship in obtaining property records without a death certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harihar
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders Criminal
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harihar
-
28-Feb-2026
Notice
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harihar
-
14-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2026
Summary: Mohamed Yusuff v. Birth and Death Registrar (Case 50/2026) The court allowed Mohamed Yusuff's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the registrar to register his mother Hameera Bi's death (dated 05.09.1975 at Ladwa Oni, Harihara). The registration was not filed initially due to family inadvertence, but the court found unchallenged evidence of her death and recognized petitioner's hardship in obtaining property records without a death certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts