Channappa vs Smt. Manjula — 66/2021
Case under Order 41 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Status: JUDGMENTS CIVIL. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KADG310007132021
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
66/2021
Filing Date
07-12-2021
Registration No
66/2021
Registration Date
09-12-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Channappa
Adv. B. Halappa
Naradamuni
Respondent(s)
Smt. Manjula
Smt. Prameelamma
Smt. Rudramma
Smt. Manjamma
Hearing History
Judge: 585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.A. No. 66/2021 The court dismissed Interim Application (IA) No. V filed by respondents Manjula and Prameelamma under Section 151 of CPC seeking permission to file late objections to applications IA No. II and III filed by appellants Channappa and Naradamuni. The court found that respondents had sufficient opportunity to file objections over more than three years but failed to do so, and even after remand by the High Court on 21.11.2025, made no attempt to file objections until 19.12.2025. The court held that at this belated stage, the objections did not deserve to be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.A. No. 66/2021 The court dismissed Interim Application (IA) No. V filed by respondents Manjula and Prameelamma under Section 151 of CPC seeking permission to file late objections to applications IA No. II and III filed by appellants Channappa and Naradamuni. The court found that respondents had sufficient opportunity to file objections over more than three years but failed to do so, and even after remand by the High Court on 21.11.2025, made no attempt to file objections until 19.12.2025. The court held that at this belated stage, the objections did not deserve to be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts