H.B. Gangadhara vs H. Kenchappa Advocate - B.HALAPPA. — 86/2014
Case under U/o Section 7Rule1ofCPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG310006742014
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
87/2014
Filing Date
20-10-2014
Registration No
86/2014
Registration Date
20-10-2014
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
H.B. Gangadhara
Adv. B.M. Siddalingaswamy
Respondent(s)
H. Kenchappa Advocate - B.HALAPPA.
Mahadevamma
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
Rudramma
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
Renukamma
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
Yashodha
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
Seethamma
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
Anusuyamma
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
H.K. Umesha
Adv. BALAJI SINGH
H.K. Jagadeesha
Adv. BALAJI SINGH
Sri.Lakshminarayana
Sri.V.P. Narasimaraju
Smt. V.P. Manjula
Sri.B.G. Vishwambara
Sri. Kiran H
Hearing History
Judge: 585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
HEARING
SUMMONS
ORDERS CIVIL
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-02-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 86/2014 Court Order (April 6, 2026): The court allowed Interim Application No. 30 filed by Defendant No. 13 (Kiran H.), permitting him to amend his written statement to contend that he is the absolute owner of property Sy. No. 53/2 (Schedule B, Item 1) purchased under a sale deed dated February 23, 2022, and that the suit is defective for non-joinder of necessary parties. The court found the amendment did not alter the suit's nature since defendant had already claimed ownership in his original written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 86/2014 Court Order (April 6, 2026): The court allowed Interim Application No. 30 filed by Defendant No. 13 (Kiran H.), permitting him to amend his written statement to contend that he is the absolute owner of property Sy. No. 53/2 (Schedule B, Item 1) purchased under a sale deed dated February 23, 2022, and that the suit is defective for non-joinder of necessary parties. The court found the amendment did not alter the suit's nature since defendant had already claimed ownership in his original written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts