CANARA BANK vs Smt. Mallamma dead by LRs — 173/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7, R 4,1. Status: JUDGMENTS CIVIL. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG310006072024
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
173/2024
Filing Date
23-08-2024
Registration No
173/2024
Registration Date
23-08-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CANARA BANK
Adv. A.VAMANAMURTHY.
Respondent(s)
Smt. Mallamma dead by LRs
Sri. Revaneppa
Sri.Rajappa
Sri.Suresh
Maruthi
Hearing History
Judge: 585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
A.D.R. CIVIL
A.D.R. CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 10-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 17-02-2026 | A.D.R. CIVIL |
| 09-01-2026 | A.D.R. CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS-173/2024 On 08-12-2025, the court examined Petitioner Witness-1 (PW-1) in Canara Bank's suit against Smt. Mallamma (deceased, represented by legal representatives) and others. The witness testified regarding a Kisan Overdraft loan agreement, mortgage deed, and related documents (marked as Exhibits 1-8). The respondents' counsel cross-examined the witness, contesting claims that Mallamma signed loan documents, properly repaid installments and interest, and that the bank charged excessive interest violating RBI guidelines. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS-173/2024 On 08-12-2025, the court examined Petitioner Witness-1 (PW-1) in Canara Bank's suit against Smt. Mallamma (deceased, represented by legal representatives) and others. The witness testified regarding a Kisan Overdraft loan agreement, mortgage deed, and related documents (marked as Exhibits 1-8). The respondents' counsel cross-examined the witness, contesting claims that Mallamma signed loan documents, properly repaid installments and interest, and that the bank charged excessive interest violating RBI guidelines. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts