Karibasappa Irani vs Shivaraju B.S Advocate - MALLIKARJUNA KANAVI., Prasanna Kumar S.. — 695/2016
Case under 166 of Mv Act Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS CIVIL. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KADG310005802016
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
695/2016
Filing Date
27-09-2016
Registration No
695/2016
Registration Date
27-09-2016
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karibasappa Irani
Respondent(s)
Shivaraju B.S Advocate - MALLIKARJUNA KANAVI., Prasanna Kumar S..
The Manager
Adv. SHANTHARAJAPPA H.C.
Hearing History
Judge: 585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 16-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 15-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 28-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - 695/2016 The court allowed Respondent No.2's application (I.A.No.13) to amend the objection statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The amendment sought to correct the identification of the vehicle driver from Respondent No.1 to Respondent No.3 (Abdul Razak), based on charge-sheet evidence and newly discovered information about fake driving license production by the insured. Respondent No.2 was directed to file the amended objection statement by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 695/2016 The court allowed Respondent No.2's application (I.A.No.13) to amend the objection statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The amendment sought to correct the identification of the vehicle driver from Respondent No.1 to Respondent No.3 (Abdul Razak), based on charge-sheet evidence and newly discovered information about fake driving license production by the insured. Respondent No.2 was directed to file the amended objection statement by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts