Sowbhagya Lakshmi vs Darshan Kumar K — 339/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KADG310004592024
Filing Number
339/2024
Filing Date
01-07-2024
Registration No
339/2024
Registration Date
01-07-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sowbhagya Lakshmi
Adv. RAMESH G. B.
R V Balaji Shresti Minor r/by Petitioner No.1
Manjamma
Respondent(s)
Darshan Kumar K
Anil Heggappanavar
The Manager, The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Harihara
Hearing History
Judge: 585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Disposed
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 03-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 02-02-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the motor vehicle compensation petition in part, awarding ₹23,02,000 (instead of the claimed ₹50,00,000) to the petitioners with 6% interest for the death of Veerendrakumar Shresti caused by rash and negligent driving of a bike on 15-04-2024. The compensation was apportioned as 60% to the widow, 20% each to the minor son and mother, with portions placed in fixed deposits as protective measures, and the insurance company (New India Assurance) was directed to deposit the amount within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the motor vehicle compensation petition in part, awarding ₹23,02,000 (instead of the claimed ₹50,00,000) to the petitioners with 6% interest for the death of Veerendrakumar Shresti caused by rash and negligent driving of a bike on 15-04-2024. The compensation was apportioned as 60% to the widow, 20% each to the minor son and mother, with portions placed in fixed deposits as protective measures, and the insurance company (New India Assurance) was directed to deposit the amount within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts