Halamma vs Yallamma Advocate - Srinivas kalal — 71/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.21, R. 11. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KADG310000462009
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Date
21-12-2009
Registration No
71/2009
Registration Date
21-12-2009
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHAR
Judge
585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Halamma
Adv. B.HALAPPA.
Respondent(s)
Yallamma Advocate - Srinivas kalal
Hanumakka
Adv. SHRINIVAS KALAL.
Jayamma
Adv. KITTUR SHAIKH IBRAHIM
Chandrappa
K.Basavarajappa
Maruthi
Rudramma
Adv. H.N.RAJASHEKHARAPPA
Siddamma
Soubhagya
Nirmala
Adv. Suresh y k
Geethabai
Adv. K.Thimmappa
Manjula
Beeresh
Adv. K.Thimmappa
Basavarajappa
Nagamma
Kannamma
Hearing History
Judge: 585-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARIHAR
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 27-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 06-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 09-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 71/2009 Case: EX-71/2009 (RW-4) Petitioner: Halamma Respondent: Yallamma Advocate - Srinivas Kalal, Hanumakka, and Jayamma Date: 05-09-2023 The court examined a property dispute concerning Item No. 4 under Section 822 of the relevant statute. The court analyzed the boundaries, measurements (12.20×18.23 sq units within a 40×60 sq unit plot), physical features, and directional boundaries of the disputed property. After detailed examination of evidence, boundary descriptions, and witness statements regarding the property's location and characteristics, the court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner (Halamma) failed to establish superior rights over Item No. 4 and that the property measurements and boundary demarcations did not support the petitioner's claims. The respondents' possession and rights were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 71/2009 Case: EX-71/2009 (RW-4) Petitioner: Halamma Respondent: Yallamma Advocate - Srinivas Kalal, Hanumakka, and Jayamma Date: 05-09-2023 The court examined a property dispute concerning Item No. 4 under Section 822 of the relevant statute. The court analyzed the boundaries, measurements (12.20×18.23 sq units within a 40×60 sq unit plot), physical features, and directional boundaries of the disputed property. After detailed examination of evidence, boundary descriptions, and witness statements regarding the property's location and characteristics, the court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner (Halamma) failed to establish superior rights over Item No. 4 and that the property measurements and boundary demarcations did not support the petitioner's claims. The respondents' possession and rights were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts