Jayalakshmi vs Rudrappa — 196/2021

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 7. Status: Evidence CIVIL. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Evidence CIVIL Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KADG220032472021

Filing Number

197/2021

Filing Date

10-Aug-2021

Registration No

196/2021

Registration Date

10-Aug-2021

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

659-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayalakshmi

    Adv. Dhananjaya K M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rudrappa

  2. 2.Bairesha

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  10. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  13. 27-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    For Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  15. 22-Aug-2025

    For Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  16. 01-Aug-2025

    For Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  17. 10-Jul-2025

    For Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  18. 16-Jun-2025

    For Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 196/2021 Outcome: Plaintiff Jayalakshmi's application to amend the plaint was ALLOWED. The court permitted her to include an additional ancestral property in the suit schedule and directed her to produce an amended plaint by 16.06.2025. Key Issue: Jayalakshmi sought to add a property to her partition suit against Rudrappa, claiming she discovered after filing that this property was also ancestral/joint family property initially excluded due to lack of documents. Defendant No.2 objected, arguing the amendment was barred and that prior settlement had already allocated the property to him. Court's Decision: The court found the amendment necessary to determine the dispute between parties and applied the liberal approach mandated by apex court precedent for amendments before trial commencement, noting it would not change the suit's nature or create new causes of action. Defendants retain opportunity to file additional written statements and cross-examine witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 03-Jun-2025

    For Amended Plaint

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  21. 24-Apr-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  22. 17-Apr-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  23. 22-Mar-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  24. 28-Feb-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  25. 20-Feb-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  26. 30-Jan-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  27. 18-Jan-2025

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  28. 20-Dec-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  29. 29-Nov-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  30. 13-Nov-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  31. 30-Oct-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  32. 15-Oct-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  33. 18-Sep-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  34. 04-Sep-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  35. 07-Aug-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  36. 18-Jul-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  37. 28-Jun-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  38. 30-May-2024

    Orders CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  39. 20-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  40. 20-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  41. 01-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  42. 08-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  43. 06-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  44. 14-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  45. 24-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  46. 31-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  47. 07-Oct-2023

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  48. 21-Sep-2023

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  49. 31-Aug-2023

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  50. 17-Aug-2023

    Objections

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  51. 15-Jul-2023

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  52. 21-Jun-2023

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  53. 24-Mar-2023

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  54. 09-Feb-2023

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  55. 21-Jan-2023

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  56. 16-Dec-2022

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  57. 17-Nov-2022

    Further chief

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  58. 20-Oct-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  59. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  60. 20-Aug-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  61. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  62. 15-Jul-2022

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  63. 30-Jun-2022

    Issues CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  64. 15-Jun-2022

    IssueView PDF

  65. 15-Jun-2022

    Issues CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  66. 09-Jun-2022

    Issues CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  67. 01-Apr-2022

    Issues CIVIL

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  68. 17-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  69. 05-Feb-2022

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  70. 18-Dec-2021

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  71. 02-Dec-2021

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  72. 03-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  73. 10-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 10-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 196/2021 Outcome: Plaintiff Jayalakshmi's application to amend the plaint was ALLOWED. The court permitted her to include an additional ancestral property in the suit schedule and directed her to produce an amended plaint by 16.06.2025. Key Issue: Jayalakshmi sought to add a property to her partition suit against Rudrappa, claiming she discovered after filing that this property was also ancestral/joint family property initially excluded due to lack of documents. Defendant No.2 objected, arguing the amendment was barred and that prior settlement had already allocated the property to him. Court's Decision: The court found the amendment necessary to determine the dispute between parties and applied the liberal approach mandated by apex court precedent for amendments before trial commencement, noting it would not change the suit's nature or create new causes of action. Defendants retain opportunity to file additional written statements and cross-examine witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case