Hidayat Ulla S/o Late Muneerulla vs Allabhakshi Khan S/o Karim Khan — 205/2024

Case under Sec802 Cpc Section 7rule1. Status: OBJECTIONS. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KADG220028752024

OBJECTIONS

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-07-2024

Filing Number

205/2024

Filing Date

16-07-2024

Registration No

205/2024

Registration Date

16-07-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

251-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI

Acts & Sections

Sec802 CPC Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

Hidayat Ulla S/o Late Muneerulla

Adv. T.B. Ramanna Belliganudu

Rehaman Khan S/o Late Sharif Khan

Adv. T.B. Ramanna Belliganudu

Respondent(s)

Allabhakshi Khan S/o Karim Khan

Mahaboob Khan S/o Karim Khan

Hearing History

Judge: 251-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI

01-06-2026

OBJECTIONS

10-04-2026

OBJECTIONS

13-03-2026

OBJECTIONS

11-03-2026

OBJECTIONS

18-02-2026

OBJECTIONS

Interim Orders

17-01-2025
Orders
17-01-2025
Orders

Case Summary: O.S.No. 205/2024 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for ad interim temporary injunction (I.A.No.II) filed under Order 39 Rule 1-2 CPC. The court found that defendants established long-standing possession of the disputed 4-acre property (Sy.No.9999, Sulekere Village) through registered sale deeds dating back to 1970, supported by continuous revenue records. The court held that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and lack standing to challenge defendants' possession, noting their suit violated mandatory procedural requirements under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC regarding representative litigation. Balance of convenience favored defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No. 205/2024 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for ad interim temporary injunction (I.A.No.II) filed under Order 39 Rule 1-2 CPC. The court found that defendants established long-standing possession of the disputed 4-acre property (Sy.No.9999, Sulekere Village) through registered sale deeds dating back to 1970, supported by continuous revenue records. The court held that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and lack standing to challenge defendants' possession, noting their suit violated mandatory procedural requirements under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC regarding representative litigation. Balance of convenience favored defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case