R. Nagesh Labour Inspector, Channagiri Circle, Channagiri. vs Shivamurthi R S/o H Ramappa — 386/2026

Case under Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act 1961 Section sec.4(1). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADG220008692026

Filing Number

388/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

386/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

659-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act 1961 Section sec.4(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. Nagesh Labour Inspector, Channagiri Circle, Channagiri.

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivamurthi R S/o H Ramappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary (CC 386/2026): The accused Shivamurthi pleaded guilty to violations under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Society Act-1961 and Rule 26 of Karnataka Rule 1963. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs 1,250 (or 7 days simple imprisonment in default), which the accused agreed to remit immediately, resulting in case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 386/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (CC 386/2026): The accused Shivamurthi pleaded guilty to violations under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Society Act-1961 and Rule 26 of Karnataka Rule 1963. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs 1,250 (or 7 days simple imprisonment in default), which the accused agreed to remit immediately, resulting in case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case