Mahalingappa S/o Siddappa vs Tahsildar — 274/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG220008112026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

274/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

1288-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahalingappa S/o Siddappa

    Adv. Siddalinga Swamy M.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tahsildar

  2. 2.Village accountant

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court ordered the Tahsildar and Village Accountant to register the birth of Mahanthesh M (son of petitioner Mahalingappa, mother Thimmamma) born on 23.06.2012 in Doddabbigehre village, Channagirintaluk, after the petitioner paid the prescribed fee and charges. The respondents had previously refused registration citing lack of proper documentation, but the court found birth registration to be essential and directed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Call on

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered the Tahsildar and Village Accountant to register the birth of Mahanthesh M (son of petitioner Mahalingappa, mother Thimmamma) born on 23.06.2012 in Doddabbigehre village, Channagirintaluk, after the petitioner paid the prescribed fee and charges. The respondents had previously refused registration citing lack of proper documentation, but the court found birth registration to be essential and directed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case