Fayaz Ahamed S/o Ameer Ahamed vs Tahsildar — 241/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG220007742026
e-Filing Number
19-02-2026
Filing Number
241/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
241/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
1288-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Fayaz Ahamed S/o Ameer Ahamed
Adv. Siddalinga Swamy M.S
Respondent(s)
Tahsildar
Village accountant
Hearing History
Judge: 1288-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Disposed
A.D.R.CRIMINAL
A.D.R.CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | A.D.R.CRIMINAL |
| 21-02-2026 | A.D.R.CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 241/2026 The court directed the Tahsildar and Village Accountant (respondents) to register the birth of petitioner Fayaz Ahamed (born 05.06.1972 in Kerebillchi village, Channagiri taluk) in the official birth records. The petitioner had filed this petition because his birth was never registered despite being born on the specified date and location. The court found birth registration to be necessary and ordered the respondents to complete the registration after the petitioner paid the prescribed fee and charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 241/2026 The court directed the Tahsildar and Village Accountant (respondents) to register the birth of petitioner Fayaz Ahamed (born 05.06.1972 in Kerebillchi village, Channagiri taluk) in the official birth records. The petitioner had filed this petition because his birth was never registered despite being born on the specified date and location. The court found birth registration to be necessary and ordered the respondents to complete the registration after the petitioner paid the prescribed fee and charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts