Fayaz Ahamed S/o Ameer Ahamed vs Tahsildar — 241/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG220007742026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

241/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

241/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

1288-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fayaz Ahamed S/o Ameer Ahamed

    Adv. Siddalinga Swamy M.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tahsildar

  2. 2.Village accountant

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 241/2026 The court directed the Tahsildar and Village Accountant (respondents) to register the birth of petitioner Fayaz Ahamed (born 05.06.1972 in Kerebillchi village, Channagiri taluk) in the official birth records. The petitioner had filed this petition because his birth was never registered despite being born on the specified date and location. The court found birth registration to be necessary and ordered the respondents to complete the registration after the petitioner paid the prescribed fee and charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    A.d.r.criminal

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 241/2026 The court directed the Tahsildar and Village Accountant (respondents) to register the birth of petitioner Fayaz Ahamed (born 05.06.1972 in Kerebillchi village, Channagiri taluk) in the official birth records. The petitioner had filed this petition because his birth was never registered despite being born on the specified date and location. The court found birth registration to be necessary and ordered the respondents to complete the registration after the petitioner paid the prescribed fee and charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case