Doddahalayya S/o Late Rudrayya vs Tahasildar — 138/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG220003612026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
138/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
138/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
251-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Doddahalayya S/o Late Rudrayya
Adv. SHEKHARAPPA R
T M Sannaswamy S/o Rudrayya T M
Kotresh D R S/o Rudrayya T M
Rudramma S W/o Late Sannahalayya D R
Karibasayya D S S/o late Sannahalayya D R
Nagarajayya H S/o Late Happayya D R
Respondent(s)
Tahasildar
Village Accountant
Hearing History
Judge: 251-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 03-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 138/2026 Summary: The court allowed the petitioners' petition directing the Tahasildar and Village Accountant to register the death date of Smt. Shanthamma (wife of Rudrayya), who died on 30.12.2005 at Doddaghatta Village, and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, supported by notarized documents (non-availability certificate, family tree, and Aadhaar cards), credible and accepted the satisfactory explanation for the delayed registration. The court exercised jurisdiction based on the High Court's stay of recent Birth and Death Registration Act amendments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 138/2026 Summary: The court allowed the petitioners' petition directing the Tahasildar and Village Accountant to register the death date of Smt. Shanthamma (wife of Rudrayya), who died on 30.12.2005 at Doddaghatta Village, and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, supported by notarized documents (non-availability certificate, family tree, and Aadhaar cards), credible and accepted the satisfactory explanation for the delayed registration. The court exercised jurisdiction based on the High Court's stay of recent Birth and Death Registration Act amendments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts