The Manager , Karnataka Grameena Bank, Hirekogaluru vs D1-Rudresha — 240/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG210008752025
e-Filing Number
15-12-2025
Filing Number
241/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
240/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Manager , Karnataka Grameena Bank, Hirekogaluru
Adv. S PRASANNAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.D1-Rudresha
-
2.D2-Ambika K S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
The court partly decreed Karnataka Grameena Bank's suit for loan recovery against defendants Rudresha and Ambika K.S. The defendants were held jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 5,07,599-26 with 6% per annum interest from decree date until realization with monthly rests, slightly less than the claimed Rs. 5,09,600 and at a lower interest rate than the requested 12%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
05-Mar-2026
Judgments CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
21-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
17-Dec-2025
Await report
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 240/2025
The court partly decreed Karnataka Grameena Bank's suit for loan recovery against defendants Rudresha and Ambika K.S. The defendants were held jointly and severally liable to pay Rs. 5,07,599-26 with 6% per annum interest from decree date until realization with monthly rests, slightly less than the claimed Rs. 5,09,600 and at a lower interest rate than the requested 12%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts