Smt Manjula vs Karibasappa alias Military Karibasappa — 116/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Judgement Criminal. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Judgement Criminal Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADG210005732025

Filing Number

116/2025

Filing Date

02-Aug-2025

Registration No

116/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

972-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt Manjula

    Adv. S PRASANNAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karibasappa alias Military Karibasappa

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Judgement Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 116/2025 Petitioner: Smt Manjula Respondent: Karibasappa alias Military Karibasappa Date: 16.12.2025 This civil case involves a dispute concerning Rs. 6,50,000. Petitioner Manjula testified that respondent Karibasappa, a friend of her husband, obtained a cheque from her which was later dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds. Manjula claims she sold agricultural land and provided the cheque as security for the transaction. The respondent allegedly filled in the cheque details himself. Manjula's testimony revealed contradictions—she initially claimed she did not lend money to the respondent, then admitted discussing the transaction with her husband. She also acknowledged receiving interest payments over phone, contradicting her earlier statement that no such arrangement existed. The court heard witness examination on 16.12.2025, with the case continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    313 StatementView PDF

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    PleaView PDF

  18. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  19. 02-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 02-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 116/2025 Petitioner: Smt Manjula Respondent: Karibasappa alias Military Karibasappa Date: 16.12.2025 This civil case involves a dispute concerning Rs. 6,50,000. Petitioner Manjula testified that respondent Karibasappa, a friend of her husband, obtained a cheque from her which was later dishonored by the bank due to insufficient funds. Manjula claims she sold agricultural land and provided the cheque as security for the transaction. The respondent allegedly filled in the cheque details himself. Manjula's testimony revealed contradictions—she initially claimed she did not lend money to the respondent, then admitted discussing the transaction with her husband. She also acknowledged receiving interest payments over phone, contradicting her earlier statement that no such arrangement existed. The court heard witness examination on 16.12.2025, with the case continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case