Geetha vs Avinash M — 85/2023
Case under U/o 5 Rule 19 a R/w 151 of Cpc Section 138. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KADG210004472023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
85/2023
Filing Date
19-08-2022
Registration No
85/2023
Registration Date
04-08-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Geetha
Adv. M.Thippeswamy
Respondent(s)
Avinash M
Hearing History
Judge: 972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
HEARING
FOR OBJECTION
FOR OBJECTION
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-04-2026 | FOR OBJECTION |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR OBJECTION |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 85/2023 Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMMFC, Channagiri Parties: Geetha (Petitioner) vs. Avinash M (Respondent) Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of defense witness Avinash M (age 33, driver) on 03.02.2026. The witness testified that he had no financial transactions with the petitioner, did not receive any money from her as alleged, and denied the petitioner's claim that he obtained a cheque under false pretenses. The witness presented bank statements and documents with his signatures as evidence. Cross-examination of the witness was permitted, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 85/2023 Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMMFC, Channagiri Parties: Geetha (Petitioner) vs. Avinash M (Respondent) Outcome: The case proceeded with examination of defense witness Avinash M (age 33, driver) on 03.02.2026. The witness testified that he had no financial transactions with the petitioner, did not receive any money from her as alleged, and denied the petitioner's claim that he obtained a cheque under false pretenses. The witness presented bank statements and documents with his signatures as evidence. Cross-examination of the witness was permitted, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts