G Asha vs R 1 Manjamma — 6/2024

Case under U/o 20 Rule 18 R/w Section 54 and 151 of Cpc Section Or.20R12. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KADG210003672024

e-Filing Number

18-03-2024

Filing Number

6/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

6/2024

Registration Date

24-Jun-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

972-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 20 Rule 18 R/w Section 54 and 151 of Cpc Section Or.20R12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G Asha

    Adv. A N LINGAMURTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R 1 Manjamma

  2. 2.R 2 Sudha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: FDP 6/2024 Court Decision: The court allowed petitioner G Asha's petition for partition and allotted her Block No. I of the suit schedule properties (Items 1-3 in Chiradoni village), while respondents Manjamma and Sudha received Blocks II and III. The court commissioner's demarcation sketch was adopted as part of the final decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the earlier partition suit (O.S. 4/2016) had been decreed on 30.07.2018 granting each party a 1/3rd share, and respondents did not appeal. Since the court-appointed commissioner properly demarcated the properties according to the preliminary decree and the petitioner accepted the report without objection, the final decree was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    For Objection

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Await report

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    For Amended Petition

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  11. 16-Aug-2025

    Await Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  12. 19-Jul-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  13. 27-Jun-2025

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  14. 06-Jun-2025

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  15. 17-Mar-2025

    For Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  16. 14-Feb-2025

    For Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  17. 09-Jan-2025

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  18. 03-Dec-2024

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  19. 25-Oct-2024

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  20. 20-Sep-2024

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  21. 13-Aug-2024

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  22. 08-Jul-2024

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  23. 25-Jun-2024

    For Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  24. 24-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FDP 6/2024 Court Decision: The court allowed petitioner G Asha's petition for partition and allotted her Block No. I of the suit schedule properties (Items 1-3 in Chiradoni village), while respondents Manjamma and Sudha received Blocks II and III. The court commissioner's demarcation sketch was adopted as part of the final decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the earlier partition suit (O.S. 4/2016) had been decreed on 30.07.2018 granting each party a 1/3rd share, and respondents did not appeal. Since the court-appointed commissioner properly demarcated the properties according to the preliminary decree and the petitioner accepted the report without objection, the final decree was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case