G Asha vs R 1 Manjamma — 6/2024
Case under U/o 20 Rule 18 R/w Section 54 and 151 of Cpc Section Or.20R12. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 15th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KADG210003672024
e-Filing Number
18-03-2024
Filing Number
6/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
24-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G Asha
Adv. A N LINGAMURTY
Respondent(s)
R 1 Manjamma
R 2 Sudha
Hearing History
Judge: 972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Disposed
ORDER
FOR OBJECTION
Await report
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTION |
| 13-01-2026 | Await report |
| 01-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: FDP 6/2024 Court Decision: The court allowed petitioner G Asha's petition for partition and allotted her Block No. I of the suit schedule properties (Items 1-3 in Chiradoni village), while respondents Manjamma and Sudha received Blocks II and III. The court commissioner's demarcation sketch was adopted as part of the final decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the earlier partition suit (O.S. 4/2016) had been decreed on 30.07.2018 granting each party a 1/3rd share, and respondents did not appeal. Since the court-appointed commissioner properly demarcated the properties according to the preliminary decree and the petitioner accepted the report without objection, the final decree was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FDP 6/2024 Court Decision: The court allowed petitioner G Asha's petition for partition and allotted her Block No. I of the suit schedule properties (Items 1-3 in Chiradoni village), while respondents Manjamma and Sudha received Blocks II and III. The court commissioner's demarcation sketch was adopted as part of the final decree. Key Reasoning: The court found that the earlier partition suit (O.S. 4/2016) had been decreed on 30.07.2018 granting each party a 1/3rd share, and respondents did not appeal. Since the court-appointed commissioner properly demarcated the properties according to the preliminary decree and the petitioner accepted the report without objection, the final decree was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts