Shobha W/o Late N.P.Kumaraswamy vs Dr.Shankara Naik S/o Sakaranaik — 41/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG210002762022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
42/2022
Filing Date
23-03-2022
Registration No
41/2022
Registration Date
23-03-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shobha W/o Late N.P.Kumaraswamy
Adv. SWAMY. K.G.K. , MAHAVEER. S.C.
P2. N.P.Rudraswamy S/o LateN.P.Kumaraswamy
Respondent(s)
Dr.Shankara Naik S/o Sakaranaik
D2. Nagendra Naik S/o Late Genyanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
D 3. Mani Naik S/o Late Gemyanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
D4. Manohar Naik S/o Late Gemyanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
D5. Murthya Naik S/o Late Gemyanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
D6. Ravikumar S/o Late Gemyanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
D7. Santhosh S/o Late Gemyanaik
Adv. B R MANJUNATH
D8. Sateesh S/o Late Laskarinaik
D9. Raja naik S/o Late Thavaryanaik
D10. Devaraju S/o Late Thavaryanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
D11. Vijaya Bai D/o Late Thavaryanaik
Adv. M THIPPESWAMY
Hearing History
Judge: 972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
EVIDENCE CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
ORDERS CIVIL
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 23-02-2026 | ORDERS CIVIL |
| 05-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case O.S.No.41/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application (IA No.5) seeking police protection to implement an injunction order dated 07.11.2023. The judge found that police protection should not be granted simultaneously with interim injunction at the initial stages of litigation, especially when the defendants deny the plaintiffs' possession claims and a Higher Court has ordered status-quo maintenance in related appeals. The case is posted for cross-examination of PW.1 as the final opportunity for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case O.S.No.41/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application (IA No.5) seeking police protection to implement an injunction order dated 07.11.2023. The judge found that police protection should not be granted simultaneously with interim injunction at the initial stages of litigation, especially when the defendants deny the plaintiffs' possession claims and a Higher Court has ordered status-quo maintenance in related appeals. The case is posted for cross-examination of PW.1 as the final opportunity for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts