T S Puttaraju S/o T.S. Singachar vs D 1 Shanthamma W/o Late K.R.Prakash Advocate - M. Lingappa — 11/2024
Case under U/s 26 Rule 7 of Cpc Section 26R/w7R1. Status: Evidence CIVIL. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG210001302024
e-Filing Number
19-02-2024
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
26-Feb-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
26-Feb-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.T S Puttaraju S/o T.S. Singachar
Adv. PARSHWANATHA D
-
2.Chandrakanthe Gowda S/o Narayana Gowda
Adv. PARSHWANATHA D
Respondent(s)
-
1.D 1 Shanthamma W/o Late K.R.Prakash Advocate - M. Lingappa
-
2.D 2 Roopa P D/o Late K.R.Prakash
Adv. M. Lingappa
-
3.D 3 K P Naveen Kumar S/o Late K.R.Prakash
Adv. M. Lingappa
-
4.D 4 Mamatha B C W/o K.P.Naveen Kumar
Adv. M. Lingappa
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
13-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 11/2024 The court rejected the defendants' application (IA No. 4) seeking permission to amend their written statement by adding a counterclaim for cancellation of a property sale agreement. The court found the amendment was filed too late—after issues were already framed and plaintiff's examination had commenced—and the defendants failed to demonstrate due diligence in seeking it earlier. The suit for specific performance of the sale contract continues, with the case posted for further cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
16-Dec-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
20-Nov-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
25-Oct-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
27-Sep-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
06-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
17-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence CIVIL
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
04-Nov-2024
For Complience
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
27-Sep-2024
To Hear
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
02-Sep-2024
For Objection To IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
05-Aug-2024
For Objection To IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
11-Jul-2024
For Objection To IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
25-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
25-Apr-2024
For Objection To IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
10-Apr-2024
For Objection To IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
25-Mar-2024
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
23-Mar-2024
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
27-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2024
Case Summary: O.S. No. 11/2024 The court rejected the defendants' application (IA No. 4) seeking permission to amend their written statement by adding a counterclaim for cancellation of a property sale agreement. The court found the amendment was filed too late—after issues were already framed and plaintiff's examination had commenced—and the defendants failed to demonstrate due diligence in seeking it earlier. The suit for specific performance of the sale contract continues, with the case posted for further cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts