Raghavendra B vs Ananda S — 92/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KADG210001252026
Filing Number
27/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raghavendra B
Adv. V.R.RAJAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ananda S
-
2.Jayalakshmi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In case MVC 92/2026, the Lok Adalath allowed the joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Raghavendra B and respondents Ananda S and Jayalakshmi under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of CPC. The court found no legal impediment to the compromise and directed a compromise award to be drawn as per the agreed terms and conditions signed by both parties and their counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
13-Mar-2026
To Hear About Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2026
In case MVC 92/2026, the Lok Adalath allowed the joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Raghavendra B and respondents Ananda S and Jayalakshmi under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of CPC. The court found no legal impediment to the compromise and directed a compromise award to be drawn as per the agreed terms and conditions signed by both parties and their counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts