Geetha G W/o Late Mallikarjuna G.S vs Pushpa Aliyas Pushpalatha W/o Late L.M.Gurusiddappa — 18/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KADG210001102024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
18/2024
Filing Date
19-02-2024
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
19-02-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Geetha G W/o Late Mallikarjuna G.S
Adv. Vijay H M
Respondent(s)
Pushpa Aliyas Pushpalatha W/o Late L.M.Gurusiddappa
Hearing History
Judge: 972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
TO HEAR ABOUT SETTLEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 07-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 01-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 10-03-2026 | TO HEAR ABOUT SETTLEMENT |
Interim Orders
313 Statement
Case Summary: CC 18/2024 Case: Civil Case 18/2024 Petitioner: Geetha G W/o Late Mallikarjuna G.S Respondent: Pushpa Aliyas Pushpalatha W/o Late L.M.Gurusiddappa Date: 08.12.2025 This is a civil case involving a loan dispute. The first witness (PW-1) testified that on 01.06.2023, the respondent borrowed ₹500 from the petitioner and was given a post-dated check as security, with repayment to occur within 6 months. The witness stated that when the check was presented to the bank after the agreed period, it was returned due to insufficient funds. The case involves disputes over the terms and circumstances of the loan transaction. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination and continuation of witness testimony (marked as "ಮರು ವಿಚಾರಣೆ" - Further Examination). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 18/2024 Case: Civil Case 18/2024 Petitioner: Geetha G W/o Late Mallikarjuna G.S Respondent: Pushpa Aliyas Pushpalatha W/o Late L.M.Gurusiddappa Date: 08.12.2025 This is a civil case involving a loan dispute. The first witness (PW-1) testified that on 01.06.2023, the respondent borrowed ₹500 from the petitioner and was given a post-dated check as security, with repayment to occur within 6 months. The witness stated that when the check was presented to the bank after the agreed period, it was returned due to insufficient funds. The case involves disputes over the terms and circumstances of the loan transaction. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination and continuation of witness testimony (marked as "ಮರು ವಿಚಾರಣೆ" - Further Examination). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts