Kanchi Rangappa vs D1. Shanthamma — 16/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7 Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG210001002026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

20/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI

Judge

972-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7 Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kanchi Rangappa

    Adv. M RAJAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D1. Shanthamma

  2. 2.D2. Bindhu

  3. 3.D3. Yateesh

  4. 4.D4. Shivamurthy

  5. 5.D5. Thammaiah

  6. 6.D6. Anjinappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In OS No. 16/2026, the Lok adalath approved a joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Kanchi Rangappa and respondents Shanthamma, Bindhu, and Yateesh under Order 23 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. The court found no legal impediment to the compromise and allowed the petition, directing that a compromise decree be drawn as per the agreed terms and conditions upon payment of stamp duty and court fees by the remaining defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    To Hear About Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Channagiri

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In OS No. 16/2026, the Lok adalath approved a joint compromise petition filed by petitioner Kanchi Rangappa and respondents Shanthamma, Bindhu, and Yateesh under Order 23 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. The court found no legal impediment to the compromise and allowed the petition, directing that a compromise decree be drawn as per the agreed terms and conditions upon payment of stamp duty and court fees by the remaining defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case