RAHAMATH ULLAKHAN S/o LATE MAHAMOOD KHAN vs D-1 SYED MATHEEB S/o LATE SYED RASHEED — 35/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 1. Status: Await order. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG210000992023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2023
Filing Number
35/2023
Filing Date
16-03-2023
Registration No
35/2023
Registration Date
16-03-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAGIRI
Judge
972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAHAMATH ULLAKHAN S/o LATE MAHAMOOD KHAN
Adv. MOHAMMED ISHAQ H
Respondent(s)
D-1 SYED MATHEEB S/o LATE SYED RASHEED
D-2 SYED THAYAB S/o LATE SYED RASHEED
D-3 SYED IRFAN S/o SYED RASHEED
D-4 SYED RIZWAN S/o LATE SYED RASHEED
D-5 RESHMA BANU SHABHANA W/o LATE SYED NASEER
D-6 SYED FARAS W/o LATE SYED NASEER
D-7SYED NABEEK W/o LATE SYED NASEER
D-8 SYED RIHAN S/o SYED NASEER
Hearing History
Judge: 972-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI
Await order
Await order
Await order
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Await order |
| 13-03-2026 | Await order |
| 02-02-2026 | Await order |
| 12-01-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 15-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 35/2023 Outcome: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No. 5). Witness summons were issued to the Branch Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank, Kabbala, directing production of the original registered Will dated 26.06.2012 by 06.01.2025 via RPAD. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's request for the bank official to give evidence regarding the Will, finding it unnecessary for proving title over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 35/2023 Outcome: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No. 5). Witness summons were issued to the Branch Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank, Kabbala, directing production of the original registered Will dated 26.06.2012 by 06.01.2025 via RPAD. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's request for the bank official to give evidence regarding the Will, finding it unnecessary for proving title over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts