Mruthyunjaya M vs Maruthi A.K. — 198/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 11th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KADG020028272025
Filing Number
198/2025
Filing Date
14-May-2025
Registration No
198/2025
Registration Date
14-May-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DAVANGERE
Judge
244-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Davangere
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mruthyunjaya M
Adv. MIRZA ISMAIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maruthi A.K.
-
2.Imran R
-
3.The Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Davangere
-
11-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
Case Summary: MVC No. 198/2023 In this motor vehicle accident compensation case, petitioner Mruthyunjaya M sought damages for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident involving an autorickshaw. The Lok-Adalath accepted a compromise petition filed by the petitioner and respondent No. 2 (vehicle owner), wherein both parties agreed to settle the matter for compensation regarding the injuries. The court disposed of the case based on the mutual settlement reached between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
IssueView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence CIVIL
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Davangere
-
29-Nov-2025
objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Davangere
-
25-Sep-2025
objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Davangere
-
04-Sep-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Davangere
-
03-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 198/2025
Case Summary: MVC No. 198/2023 In this motor vehicle accident compensation case, petitioner Mruthyunjaya M sought damages for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident involving an autorickshaw. The Lok-Adalath accepted a compromise petition filed by the petitioner and respondent No. 2 (vehicle owner), wherein both parties agreed to settle the matter for compensation regarding the injuries. The court disposed of the case based on the mutual settlement reached between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts