Hanumanthappa B vs Manjunatha Y — 213/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(C). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL MISC APPEAL CASES
CNR: KADG010033082025
Filing Number
213/2025
Filing Date
25-10-2025
Registration No
213/2025
Registration Date
25-10-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanumanthappa B
Adv. PARASHURAMAPPA.A.K.
Respondent(s)
Manjunatha Y
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 14-03-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 17-02-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Appeal No. 213/2025 The appellate court dismissed Hanumanthappa's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Hanumanthappa had borrowed ₹2,00,000 from Manjunatha and issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonored for insufficient funds. After Manjunatha served a statutory notice, Hanumanthappa failed to respond or pay, prompting the complaint. The trial court convicted him and imposed a fine of ₹2,30,000 with 6-month imprisonment in default. On appeal, the court found that Hanumanthappa failed to rebut the statutory presumption by refusing to cross-examine the complainant or present any defense evidence, thereby upholding the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Appeal No. 213/2025 The appellate court dismissed Hanumanthappa's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Hanumanthappa had borrowed ₹2,00,000 from Manjunatha and issued a post-dated cheque that was dishonored for insufficient funds. After Manjunatha served a statutory notice, Hanumanthappa failed to respond or pay, prompting the complaint. The trial court convicted him and imposed a fine of ₹2,30,000 with 6-month imprisonment in default. On appeal, the court found that Hanumanthappa failed to rebut the statutory presumption by refusing to cross-examine the complainant or present any defense evidence, thereby upholding the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts